← Back to blog
•6 min read

The 7 Biggest AI Adoption Challenges (And How to Fix Them)

Security concerns, ROI questions, skeptical engineers—here's how to navigate the real blockers to AI adoption in enterprises.

You want your team to use AI. Leadership bought licenses. You ran training. But adoption is still sluggish.

The problem isn't the tool. It's one (or more) of these seven blockers.

We've helped 30+ teams roll out AI. Here's what actually stops adoption—and how to fix it.

1. "We Don't Trust AI With Our Code"

The concern: "What if it leaks our codebase? What if it trains on our data?"

Why it matters: This is a legitimate concern, especially in regulated industries (finance, healthcare, defense).

How to fix it:

  • Use tools with zero data retention: Cursor Enterprise, GitHub Copilot Business, and Claude Pro don't train on your data.
  • Deploy on-prem models: If security is critical, run local models (Codestral, StarCoder, Llama) via OpenClaw or similar.
  • Show the privacy policy: Walk through the vendor's data policy with your security team. Most enterprise tools are designed for this.

What we do: We run a 30-min security review with the InfoSec team before the pilot. We show logs, explain data flow, and document everything. No surprises.

2. "We Can't Measure ROI"

The concern: "How do we know this is worth the money?"

Why it matters: Leadership needs to justify the spend. "Vibes" aren't enough.

How to fix it:

  • Track time saved: Use time-tracking or surveys to measure hours saved on repetitive tasks (refactors, tests, docs, status updates).
  • Track adoption: Daily active users, PRs with AI assistance, questions in Slack.
  • Track velocity: If you're using Jira/Linear, measure cycle time before and after.

What we do: We set up a simple dashboard (Notion or Google Sheets) that tracks:

  • Active users per week
  • Hours saved (estimated)
  • Automations deployed
  • Feedback sentiment

After 4 weeks, we have real data to show leadership.

3. "Our Engineers Are Skeptical"

The concern: "We have senior devs who think AI is hype. They won't use it."

Why it matters: If your best engineers don't buy in, no one else will.

How to fix it:

  • Acknowledge the skepticism: Don't oversell. Say "AI is a tool. It's not magic. Let's test it on real work."
  • Start with their pain points: Ask: "What repetitive task do you hate?" Then show AI solving that.
  • Use their code: Don't demo a todo app. Use their codebase.
  • Show failure modes: Be honest about where AI sucks (architecture, novel algorithms, security-critical code).

What we do: We run a 30-min "skeptic session" with senior engineers before the workshop. We show them the boundaries, answer hard questions, and let them poke holes. Then they become champions.

4. "We Don't Have Time to Learn This"

The concern: "We're already underwater. We can't add another tool."

Why it matters: If AI feels like more work, people won't adopt it.

How to fix it:

  • Make it part of workflow: Don't make AI a separate step. Integrate it into their existing tools (GitHub, Slack, Jira).
  • Automate first: Before you train people, ship 1-2 automations that save time. Prove value before asking for effort.
  • Keep training short: 90 minutes, hands-on, real work. No 3-day bootcamps.

What we do: We flip the model. Week 1: workshop (90 mins). Week 2: we ship automations that save time. By Week 3, people want to use AI because they've seen the ROI.

5. "We Tried It Once and It Sucked"

The concern: "We used ChatGPT to write some code. It was garbage. Why would we trust this?"

Why it matters: Bad first impressions kill adoption.

How to fix it:

  • Teach prompting: Generic prompts → generic results. Specific prompts → useful output. Show the difference.
  • Use better tools: ChatGPT is fine for brainstorming. For code, use Cursor, Copilot, or Claude Code—tools built for development.
  • Show iteration: AI is not one-and-done. It's prompt → review → iterate → ship.

What we do: We live-code during the workshop. We show bad prompts, good prompts, and how to iterate. People see the technique, not just the output.

6. "We Don't Know What to Automate"

The concern: "We know AI can help, but we don't know where to start."

Why it matters: If people don't have a clear use case, they won't experiment.

How to fix it:

  • Run a workflow audit: Map out a week of work. Identify repetitive tasks (status updates, ticket creation, email drafts, code reviews).
  • Start with low-hanging fruit: Pick one task that's repetitive, low-risk, and annoying. Automate that.
  • Use a prompt library: Give people 30-50 example prompts for common tasks.

What we do: We send a pre-workshop survey: "What's one repetitive task you'd love to automate?" Then we demo that task in the workshop.

7. "We Don't Have Internal Champions"

The concern: "We trained people, but no one's evangelizing this."

Why it matters: Adoption needs champions—people who answer questions, share wins, and push the tool forward.

How to fix it:

  • Identify 1-2 champions: Find people who are early adopters, good communicators, and respected by peers.
  • Give them resources: Prompt library, Slack channel, office hours.
  • Recognize their work: Make them the "AI expert" publicly. Give them speaking slots, shoutouts, etc.

What we do: In every pilot, we identify 1-2 champions and run weekly check-ins with them for a month. They become the internal advocates.

The Pattern That Works

Across 30+ rollouts, the pattern that works is:

  1. Get buy-in from security and leadership (address concerns upfront)
  2. Run a hands-on workshop (90 mins, real work)
  3. Ship 1-3 automations (prove value without asking for effort)
  4. Support with async resources (Slack, office hours, prompt library)
  5. Measure and iterate (track usage, gather feedback, improve)

Treat it as a system, not a one-time event.

Want Help Navigating These Challenges?

We've seen it all. We know how to navigate security teams, skeptical engineers, and ROI questions.

Let's run a pilot for your team.

Book a 30-min discovery call →

Bonus: Our Pre-Pilot Security Checklist

Use this to align with InfoSec before starting:

  • [ ] Which tools are we evaluating? (Cursor, Copilot, Claude, etc.)
  • [ ] Do they train on our data? (Get written confirmation)
  • [ ] Where is data stored? (US, EU, on-prem?)
  • [ ] Can we disable telemetry?
  • [ ] Can we audit logs?
  • [ ] Can we run this on-prem if needed?
  • [ ] What's the incident response process if there's a breach?

Share this with your security team before the pilot starts.

Get started

Want help with AI adoption?

We run hands-on workshops and ship workflow automations for engineering and ops teams.

Book a 30-min discovery call →